In space, astronauts face a unique set of challenges due to the effects of microgravity, which can lead to significant muscle atrophy and bone density loss. Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training has emerged as a promising countermeasure, and researchers are delving into its potential benefits for astronauts' rehabilitation in space.
The Problem in Space: Muscle Atrophy and Bone Density Loss
In the absence of gravity, the mechanical loading that normally helps maintain muscle and bone health on Earth is significantly reduced. As a result, astronauts experience muscle weakening and bone demineralization. To counteract these effects, astronauts currently rely on heavy-duty exercise equipment like the Advanced Resistive Exercise Device (ARED), which provides high-resistance training. While effective, such equipment can be bulky and pose logistical challenges in the confined space of a spacecraft.
The BFR Solution: Low Load, High Impact
BFR training involves applying external pressure to the limbs to restrict blood flow partially during low-intensity exercise. While this might sound counterintuitive, studies have shown that BFR training can induce muscle hypertrophy and strength gains similar to those achieved with high-intensity resistance training, but with significantly lower loads. This makes it an ideal solution for astronauts, as it requires less bulky equipment and reduces the strain on muscles and joints.
In BFR training, resistances are usually around 30% of an astronaut’s one-repetition maximum (1RM), which is much lower than traditional strength training loads. Yet, the effects are remarkably similar to those of higher-intensity training, leading to increased muscle mass and strength.
The Potential of BFR for Bone Health
There’s also growing evidence suggesting that BFR may have a positive impact on bone mass and density. Though the exact mechanisms are still under investigation, BFR training may promote bone health by inducing fatigue in Type I muscle fibers, leading to recruitment of Type II fibers, and stimulating factors such as cell swelling, hormone release, and oxidative stress.
Key Benefits of BFR Training in Space
Reduced Equipment Needs: BFR training requires smaller, more compact equipment, which is ideal for the limited space available in spacecraft. This addresses the logistical challenges astronauts face with bulky exercise devices.
Lower Injury Risk: BFR’s low-load nature reduces strain on muscles and joints, potentially lowering the risk of injury, which is crucial in a microgravity environment where recovery is more difficult.
Versatility: BFR can be used with various exercise modalities, such as low-intensity walking or running, making it a flexible addition to astronauts’ rehabilitation routines.
Potential for Bone Density Improvement
Research suggests that BFR might even enhance bone mass and density. While this area still needs more exploration, the effects could be beneficial for maintaining astronaut bone health during long-duration space missions.
Cardiovascular Health
BFR training has also been shown to provide a potent stimulus to the cardiovascular system, helping to reduce orthostatic intolerance (the difficulty astronauts face when standing up after returning to Earth).
Future Research Needs:
Although BFR shows great promise, further studies are required to fully understand its effects in space. There is a need for more research into how BFR impacts tendon health and how it might behave in the low-pressure, microgravity environment of space. Also, future studies should examine the impact of factors like hypobaric hypoxia or blood redistribution that might occur on long-duration missions, such as to Mars.
Gravity isn’t constant for astronauts—it changes throughout their journey!
Earth (1G) – Normal Gravity 🌍
Everyday movements feel effortless.
Bones & muscles stay strong because they constantly work against gravity.
Launch (+3 to +4Gx) – Crushing Acceleration 🚀
Astronauts feel 3-4 times heavier as they are pressed into their seats.
Blood shifts downward, making it harder to move or even breathe.
The heart works overtime to keep blood flowing to the brain.
Space (Microgravity) – Floating Free 🛰️
Muscles & bones weaken because they’re no longer needed to fight gravity.
The vestibular system (inner ear balance) gets confused—causing space motion sickness.
Fluids move upward, giving astronauts a puffy face & chicken legs.
Re-entry (+4 to +5Gz) – Gravity Hits Hard 🌎
The force of 4-5 times body weight makes simple movements exhausting.
Blood shifts downward again, making astronauts feel lightheaded & weak.
They struggle to lift their heads or even sit up straight.
Earth Return (1g Again) – The Struggle to Stand 🏃♂️
Balance is off as the body relearns how to handle gravity.
Muscles feel weak—even lifting a pencil feels like a workout!
45 days of rehab begins to restore strength, coordination, and balance.
The direction of G-forces depends on how acceleration acts on the astronaut’s body inside the spacecraft.
Key Difference:
+Gx in Launch = Force pushes the back (lying down).
+Gz in Re-entry = Force pushes downward (seated upright).
Why are astronauts positioned differently during launch and re-entry?
Astronauts are positioned differently during launch and re-entry to minimize the risk of injury and ensure maximum safety. During launch, astronauts lie back in a semi-reclined position to withstand the intense G-forces pushing them backward into the seat. This helps distribute the forces across the body evenly. During re-entry, astronauts are positioned upright or in a slightly reclined position to manage the gravitational forces during deceleration and maintain optimal blood circulation to the brain, reducing the risk of G-induced Loss of Consciousness (G-LOC). This careful positioning is vital for the astronauts' safety and comfort throughout.
Suborbital flights:
The rapid transition from high-G acceleration launch forces to 0-G weightlessness, followed by a high-G deceleration of entry, is a fundamental component of suborbital space flight. The amount and orientation of acceleration and gravity load imposed on participants depends upon flight profile and vehicle configuration. To avoid significant medical concerns and maximize enjoyment, it is suggested that the average passenger should not be exposed to g-loads more than 3.0 +Gx and 2.0 +Gz for more than thirty minutes. Neuro-vestibular, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal problems are the primary health concerns associated with altered gravity exposure; however, it can have negative effects on pulmonary functions as well. While the short duration of exposure to altered gravity eliminates any concerns for most of the health problems in apparently healthy individuals, there is little concern for participants “with pre-existing medical conditions” (Musselman, B. T., & Hampton, S. Factors influencing the emergence of suborbital space tourism. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 2020; Vol 7(2).)
The Need for Further Research:
It would be interesting to research in future how activities in one phase of flight will impact the next.
Urinary retention and urinary tract infections (UTIs) are closely linked in spaceflight, but which comes first?
NASA's Integrated Medical Model predicts urinary conditions are among the top three reasons for medical evacuation from the ISS.
Notable Cases in Space:
Fred Haise, the lunar module pilot of Apollo 13, developed a urinary tract infection during the mission that progressed to pyelonephritis, with lethargy, fevers, and flank pain persisting throughout the duration of the mission. Post-mission urine cultures demonstrated Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the causative organism, and he was subsequently treated with a successful course of antibiotics. (Johnston RS, Dietlein LF, Berry CA, Parker JF, West V. Biomedical Results of Apollo. Published online January 1, 1975. Accessed June 22, 2021. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760005580)
In 1985, Russian cosmonaut Vladimir Vasyutin underwent a pre-mature de-orbit from the space station Salyut 7 due to a case of prostatitis. (Jones JA, Jennings R, Pietryzk R, Ciftcioglu N, Stepaniak P. Genitourinary issues during spaceflight: a review. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17 Suppl 1:S64-67. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901431)
Causes: (Nicogossian et al Space Physiology and Medicine3rd edition, Reschke et al Space Biology and Medicine, Davis et al ASEM March 1993, Jennings J VestibRes 1998, Wotring FASEB J. 2015)
Causes of urinary retention are multifactorial and include- dehydration, delayed voiding (due to work schedules or WCS availability), the use of various pharmacologic agents, and underlying predisposing factors, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Anticholinergic medications (scopolamine and promethazine), which are used to treat space motion sickness, and alpha-adrenergic agonists, which are used to treat nasal congestion and head fullness, can both contribute to the development of urinary retention.
Odds of developing urinary retention are 3 times higher among astronauts who took promethazine.
The UTI Link: (NASA Astronaut Urinary Conditions Associated with Spaceflight Aerospace Medical Association 87thAnnual Scientific Meeting April 28, 2016)
Astronauts with urinary retention are 25 times more likely to develop a UTI.
Those using bladder catheters are 2.5 times more likely to get a UTI.
What’s Being Done:
Treatments like antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone) and in-flight catheterization are used to manage UTIs and urinary retention.
New methods like ultrasound-guided percutaneous suprapubic catheter insertion have been developed and tested in simulated microgravity conditions for more severe cases.
Female astronauts:
Female astronauts are four times more likely to experience urinary retention than males, a concerning statistic given the greater number of male astronauts.
According to data from Space Shuttle missions STS-1 through STS-114 there were a total of 9 cases of in-flight urinary incontinence, all of which occurred in female crew members.
The majority of these cases were described as stress urinary incontinence. it is unclear if these cases represent true stress incontinence or if they resulted from the collection of urine in the distal vagina (due to lack of gravitational forces) that was subsequently expelled with increased abdominal pressure.
There have been discussions with female crewmembers about applying perineal pressure after completion of voiding, in order to assist in clearing any vaginal backflow of urine when using the various funnel adaptors attached to the reduced pressure hoses of the various onorbit waste management systems. These crewmembers typically did not experience any urinary leakage in full gravity. It was therefore speculated that the new urinary soiling in microgravity may have been due exclusively to vaginal pooling of urine during micturition.
Contradictory Terrestrial Data:
On Earth, urinary retention is more common in men as they age, with prostate-related issues being a major cause.PowerPoint Presentation
In contrast, urinary retention in women is less common, but not rare. However, research into female urinary retention is limited, as it has often been considered a male-dominated issue due to prostate problems.
Interestingly, studies on Earth have not fully explored how the microgravity environment might amplify these issues, making spaceflight research critical.
The Need for Further Research:
The relationship between urinary retention and UTIs in spaceflight needs deeper investigation, especially regarding its impact on female astronauts.
Research into how microgravity affects urinary function long-term, is essential for future missions.
In summary, urinary retention and UTIs are deeply intertwined in space, creating a complex cycle that needs constant attention and innovative solutions.